AudiWorld Forums: Yea it was a tough decision...

2008 Discussion Forum Stats: Click Here

2008: Audi Year in Review

Long Term Garage: 2009 A5 3.2 quattro S-line

[Thread] [Post Followup] [Post Picture] [Search Forums] [Photography Discussion]

Yea it was a tough decision...

Posted by: Rice Etr on 2008-09-15 08:19:02
Account #: 3380

In Reply to: That'a a good one - light, sharp, IS posted by TristanP on 2008-09-15 07:10:13

In the end I just didn't see myself using this lens for low light / indoor shooting. The f/2.8 was also considerably more expensive and almost 30% heavier. All things considered, excluding the low light superiority, the majority of reviews said the f/4 was a better lens overall.

Stay at Western North Carolina's Premiere B&B

SONY VAIO TX series UMPC for sale

Nuke and Pave

Thread:

Lens recommendation. - Rice Etr 2008-09-10 07:17:17 (100 views)

Bought the EF 70-200 f/4L USM IS... - Rice Etr 2008-09-15 06:51:23 (26 views)

That'a a good one - light, sharp, IS - TristanP 2008-09-15 07:10:13 (18 views)

Yea it was a tough decision... - Rice Etr 2008-09-15 08:19:02 (21 views)

Nice! Enjoy! - Kris Hansen 2008-09-15 06:55:15 (11 views)

70-200 is way too long for typical tourist shots and on the short end for shooting at the track - truth 2008-09-10 09:54:14 (28 views)

Somewhat disagree for the track, often 200mm is enough - Morgan Conrad 2008-09-10 12:34:26 (34 views)

In my mind, that would be two lenses - TristanP 2008-09-10 08:05:47 (64 views)

I neglected to say that I've got a 28-135 already... - Rice Etr 2008-09-10 08:12:07 (48 views)

I would say a 300 F2.8 with a 1.4x multiplier on a cropped body :) - Tanner 2008-09-10 08:19:23 (56 views)

Listen to Tanner, but realize a multi-week rental on any of the lenses you consider will be pricey - Mike S 2008-09-10 10:14:06 (29 views)

I can see the logic in the 300 for the track stuff - Rice Etr 2008-09-10 13:00:52 (26 views)

You have a multiplier for the 70-200? - Tanner 2008-09-10 18:56:43 (20 views)

I don't no. It's not too expensive to rent it so I might just do that. - Rice Etr 2008-09-11 07:47:04 (14 views)

Re: I would say a 300 F2.8 with a 1.4x multiplier on a cropped body :) - Rice Etr 2008-09-10 08:59:55 (40 views)

The 28-135 should work for that though.. - Kris Hansen 2008-09-10 10:03:32 (22 views)

I think so. You coming down for Petite? - Rice Etr 2008-09-10 10:24:07 (21 views)

Can't.. got other things going on.... - Kris Hansen 2008-09-10 10:31:50 (27 views)

crap...:-\ - Rice Etr 2008-09-10 12:57:53 (14 views)

I wouldn't consider shooting in the city without at least a wide angle (1x-50ish) - TristanP 2008-09-10 09:44:00 (31 views)

Well with my crop, my 28-135 is really closer to a 50 so it should be good. - Rice Etr 2008-09-10 10:03:05 (23 views)

No, I'm saying you need the wide end even wider due to the crop - TristanP 2008-09-10 10:25:16 (25 views)

Yep, wide angle is a must for the tourist - Tanner 2008-09-10 10:30:27 (27 views)

Agree. - CatOne 2008-09-10 08:53:51 (19 views)

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option: